The American Dream Moves Downtown

In mid-twentieth-century America, the dream was to raise children in a single-family house with a yard, away from the traffic and noise in downtown areas. And the U.S. highway system stretched out to new residential subdivisions in the suburbs, as homes added more and more garages for everyone’s cars.

Downtown Trends

Major trends now under way in U.S. downtowns include:

  • Restoring and enhancing nature, such as ponds, parks, and even urban farms.
  • Integrating commercial and residential functions in multistory buildings.
  • Making public transit available, usually light-rail systems.
  • Restoring the public infrastructure to favor people over cars.
  • Combining landscaping with the restoration of all aspects of the public infrastructure.
  • Converting surface parking lots into parks, gardens, and open spaces.
  • Attracting culture, the arts, and entertainment facilities.
  • Attracting educational institutions and nonprofit organizations.
  • Attracting or keeping smaller specialized businesses downtown while bigger businesses relocate in malls or “big-box” sites.
  • Supporting ethnic and niche stores, such as markets, delicatessens, bakeries, and restaurants.
  • Providing a sense of “public place” in the core of downtowns to ensure that shared spaces feel truly shared.

This trend now is in the process of reversing. The children born in the middle of the twentieth century are now grown, and older parents are relocating to more-convenient downtown areas. Young professionals focusing on their respective jobs, too, head toward inner-city areas, postponing the American dream of starting a family and moving to the suburbs until later in life. Another group of urban dwellers consists of those who would like to live without needing a vehicle. Hence, a new type of residential development has emerged around public transit stations, called Transit-Oriented Developments. The market for condominiums and townhouses located next to public light-rail transit systems has developed rapidly in recent decades.

the Riverwalk District in downtown Reno, Nevada

Now the challenge for communities is to make downtowns more attractive, more livable. Government planners at the state and local levels need to advocate for changes that will benefit downtown areas. One model is the high-rise residential area in the Lower East Side of New York City a century ago, where individuals and families lived in multistory residential structures that featured an assortment of commercial businesses located on the ground floor. All of the restaurants, markets, and other types of commercial activity took place at street level.

It’s also great for those commercial businesses established on the ground level to have their market built-in above them. Rezoning downtowns to allow more residential units above ground-level businesses is the wave of the future. If you build them, people will come, especially if there’s public transit in the area.

In addition to such mixed-use zoning, blending the commercial and the residential, thriving communities should increasingly bring arts, entertainment, and culture back to downtown areas. Some cities have used libraries and museums as tools to stimulate economic development, while others are trying to lure educational institutions and nonprofit organizations back downtown.

There is also a big trend to preserve what’s left of nature in urban environments, restoring what’s been removed over the decades. Cities are expanding parks, wetlands, and waterways; they’re enhancing pedestrian access and movement by narrowing the streets and widening walkways, bikeways, plazas, and other public areas, reversing the car-centric planning of the previous century. This trend, too, has facilitated the movement of people back to downtown areas.

When successful, these efforts stimulate the local economy and attract the type of businesses, educational institutions, and nonprofit organizations that would benefit from revitalized downtown areas. Additional economic-development incentives would help attract desirable private, educational, and nonprofit institutions to downtowns, but selling local public officials on such incentives requires a clear demonstration of their reasonableness and long-term benefits to the taxpayers and all of the citizens within the community. A nice downtown should serve as a great public place not only for those who live there, but also for other citizens in the area who come to work, shop, eat, or participate in cultural attractions.

Prudent economic-development incentives that promote downtown renewal are a wise way to generate revenues without raising taxes and can assist in balancing a community’s budget. Most cities evolved piecemeal over the years and now need to be retrofitted and redesigned for the future.

Planning and zoning regulations should be in place to accommodate mixed land-uses, infill, and redevelopment projects. Call it New Urbanism, Sustainability, Pedestrian Cities, Healthy Cities, Inner-City Renewal, or the Green Cities Movement—these practices can be applied to projects of all sizes to promote livability in a single building, on a full block, in a neighborhood, and even an entire community.

Roger L. Kemp is an adjunct professor in the Public Administration Program, University of New Haven, and in the Urban Studies Program, Southern

2 thoughts on “The American Dream Moves Downtown”

  1. I don’t think this is plausible for Greenfield but I always liked the concept seen in many older European towns of blocking off motor traffic in the business districts and permitting bicycle and pedestrian traffic only. Scenes of citizens walking among each other just seems like it would improve or tighten relationships and a sense of community. In CA we didn’t even have sidewalks in neighborhoods and everyone’s back yards were fenced off with “privacy” screens. You didn’t even know your neighbor let along who lived on the next block. To a lesser extent, the same has happened in even our small towns. The car maybe makes us too mobile and weakens our connections.

Leave a Reply